Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A new working paper by Luis E Guarnizo and Ali R Chaudhary compares how two migrant groups, from Dominica and Columbia, in two different destination countries, Spain and Italy, assimilate and engage with their country of origin

In recent decades the number of people moving across borders for work, family, refuge, and leisure has grown significantly. Migrants from one country commonly move to several different countries of destination, encountering different economic, political, and economic opportunities and barriers. Despite this, the majority of existing studies on the assimilation and transnational practices of migrants look at only one country of destination, which limits our understanding of how the different contexts of reception in destination countries will affect migrant’s future engagement with their origin country.

In this working paper authors  Luis E Guarnizo and Ali R Chaudhary address this gap by comparing two migrant groups, from Dominica and Columbia, in two different destination countries, Spain and Italy. Ali Chaudhary was a visiting fellow at IMI in Micahelmas 2013.

Similar stories

Working Paper: Immigration policy effects – A conceptual framework

Liv Bjerre provides a conceptual framework for the analysis of immigration policy effects by arguing that immigration policies have varying effects on different categories of immigrants whether they are regular immigrants, asylum seekers or irregular immigrants