Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The third TRANSMIC working paper proposes a new theoretical framework to better understand how migrants become active agents of change

The latest IMI working paper, by Marieke van Houte, proposes a new theoretical framework by which to better measure the relationship between migration and (political) change. By seeking to better understand the processes of why people migrate and how they become involved in transnational activities, the author aims to answer two key concerns in migration and development:  

1. What are the consequences of migration and transnational engagement for change in the country of origin?

and

2. How does change lead people to become a) migrants and b) transnationally engaged?

Using this new framework, the author examines migrants' agency, the structures within which they operate, their capacity and their desires, in order to create a more holistic picture of the complexity of the impact of migration on development and change. In using this new framework this paper aims to provide insights into how migrants become active agents of (political) change, and, furthermore, which migrants contribute to what kind of change.

This paper is the third published working paper from a major EC-funded project on transnational migration, citizenship and the circulation of rights and responsibilities (TRANSMIC).

Download the working paper

Read more about the TRANSMIC project

Similar stories

Working Paper: Immigration policy effects – A conceptual framework

Liv Bjerre provides a conceptual framework for the analysis of immigration policy effects by arguing that immigration policies have varying effects on different categories of immigrants whether they are regular immigrants, asylum seekers or irregular immigrants